The Backdrop
A PE-Backed Business Process Outsourcing Company was executing a structured growth plan from $340M to $1.02B by 2023. Six value hotspots defined the agenda: healthcare expansion, new logo acquisition, M&A, geographic mix shift, overhead reduction, and emerging technology. Each hotspot required specific leaders to deliver specific outcomes. FulcrumQ was engaged to determine whether the right talent was in the right roles before the exit trajectory was set.
The Challenge
- Map the $1.02B value agenda to 19 critical roles responsible for delivering it
- Quantify value at risk by role before capability gaps compounded into execution failures
- Identify structural and capability interventions required to protect exit value
The Approach
FulcrumQ applied the Talent to Value™ discipline to translate the full value agenda into a precise accountability map of 19 critical roles. Jobs to be Done were defined against each value hotspot with dollar weightings. Role Design was examined across authority, capacity, attractiveness, and resistance. For 11 of the 19 roles, structured JTBD-anchored behavioral interviews, 360-degree stakeholder feedback, Hogan psychometric assessment, and performance data were integrated into a multi-variable readiness picture. Value at risk was probability-weighted by role, giving the PE sponsor a direct line between talent readiness and exit valuation.
Value Architecture
FulcrumQ assigned dollar-weighted accountability to all 19 critical roles across 6 value hotspots. The EVP Operations (Americas) carried $130M; the EVP Sales carried $123M. Critically, 80% of critical roles sat below N-1, representing $782M of the target. Exit delivery was concentrated at a level the Client had not previously quantified.
N-2 Capability Gap
9% of critical roles carried capability lag requiring talent upgrade at N-2. With $782M of exit value concentrated below N-1, this was a structural execution risk. Leaving it unresolved would prevent the value agenda from arriving on schedule for the exit event.
Role Design Gap: CIO
The CIO held convening authority over Digital Solutions, not decision rights. The role was adequate for BAU delivery but structurally misaligned for the Digital transformation JTBD, which carried $150M-$200M in expected value. Correcting this authority gap was a prerequisite for the technology differentiation the exit thesis required.
Value at Risk: $125M
FulcrumQ quantified $125M in total value at risk across the 11 assessed roles using probability-weighted JTBD analysis. This figure converted a talent concern into a capital allocation decision, directing intervention toward the highest-return exposures before risk compounded.

FulcrumQ delivered a complete value-to-role accountability map, readiness profiles for 11 of 19 critical roles, $125M in quantified execution risk, and a Value Coaching Plan for every role-talent combination. The Client and its PE sponsor entered the exit preparation window with full visibility into where value was at risk and what interventions would protect it. Risk was surfaced. Interventions were sequenced. The thesis was protected.
“ Exit value is not created at the moment of sale. It is protected or destroyed in the decisions made years before the process begins.”